| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800U vs 1700


Description
The 5800U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800U gets a score of 314.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f11
Core
Cezanne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
71.16k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
314.55k points
333.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.34k
12.65k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.78k
20.95k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
4.63k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.59k
14.47k (x0.7)
TOTAL
71.16k
52.69k (x0.74)

Multithread

5800U

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
102.74k
101.78k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
143.27k
177.57k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.13k
47.18k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.41k
6.78k (x0.65)
TOTAL
314.55k
333.31k (x1.06)

Performance/W
5800U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6849 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9551 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3875 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
694 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
20970 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4168 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5178 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4679 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16172 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4