Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306f2
Core
Summit Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
20.96k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
11.74k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
3.4k (x0.23)
TOTAL
52.69k
40.71k (x0.77)
Multithread
1700
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
531.68k (x5.22)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
342.28k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
133.22k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
9.19k (x1.36)
TOTAL
333.31k
1016.36k (x3.05)
Performance/W
1700
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4