Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.7 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.7 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306a9
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4 /8
TDP
65 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
13.16k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
12.51k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
5.62k (x0.34)
TOTAL
57.75k
36.29k (x0.63)
Multithread
1700
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
51.89k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
57.35k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
23.74k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
6.4k (x1)
TOTAL
381.16k
139.38k (x0.37)
Performance/W
1700
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1855 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3036 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
5864 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3770 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4490 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
15609 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4