| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i9-10980XE


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.7 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
50657
Core
Summit Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
25344 kB
Date
March 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
1241.12k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.4k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
20.97k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.82k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
8.86k (x0.53)
TOTAL
57.75k
52.05k (x0.9)

Multithread

1700

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
316.84k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
461.09k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
129.82k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
22.09k (x3.45)
TOTAL
381.16k
929.85k (x2.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
29.53k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.59k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
5.99k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
10.22k (x0.71)
TOTAL
52.69k
68.33k (x1.3)

Multithread

1700

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
587.06k (x5.77)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
496.41k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
134.66k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
22.99k (x3.39)
TOTAL
333.31k
1241.12k (x3.72)

Performance/W
1700
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4