Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-8700
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the i7-8700 gets 322.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 381.2 k points while the i7-8700 gets 322.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
October 2017
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
13951
16574 (18.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
22024
25517 (15.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5167
6014 (16.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
16611
12818 (-22.84%)
TOTAL
57753
60922 (5.49%)
Multithread
1700
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
120586
101852 (-15.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
197339
170305 (-13.70%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56829
43124 (-24.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
6405
7110 (11.00%)
TOTAL
381159
322391 (-15.42%)
Performance/W
1700
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
1855 points/W
1567 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3036 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
663 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
5864 points/W
4960 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
3770 points/GHz
3603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5952 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
1307 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4490 points/GHz
2786 points/GHz
TOTAL
15609 points/GHz
13244 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9