Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-8650U
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2017
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
21.61k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
19.69k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
9.95k (x0.69)
TOTAL
52.69k
55.86k (x1.06)
Multithread
1700
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
78.38k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
72.02k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
16.95k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.15k (x0.91)
TOTAL
333.31k
173.49k (x0.52)
Performance/W
1700
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4