| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i5-6400


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i5-6400 gets 174.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
506e3
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
174.05k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
11.82k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
18.36k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.43k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
4.95k (x0.3)
TOTAL
57.75k
39.56k (x0.68)

Multithread

1700

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
46.04k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
69.47k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
16.33k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
7.74k (x1.21)
TOTAL
381.16k
139.58k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
21.1k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
18.28k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.22k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
4.45k (x0.31)
TOTAL
52.69k
48.05k (x0.91)

Multithread

1700

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
80.03k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
71.1k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
16.19k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.73k (x0.99)
TOTAL
333.31k
174.05k (x0.52)

Performance/W
1700
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
2678 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
14560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4