| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 5600H


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.3 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
255.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
14.34k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
17.67k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
6.41k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
14.95k (x1.03)
TOTAL
52.69k
53.37k (x1.01)

Multithread

1700

5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
83.58k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
119.22k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
48.56k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.83k (x0.56)
TOTAL
333.31k
255.19k (x0.77)

Performance/W
1700
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
5671 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4