| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.3 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a20f12
Core
Summit Ridge
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2017
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
22.73k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
24.59k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
11.44k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
25.03k (x1.73)
TOTAL
52.69k
83.79k (x1.59)

Multithread

1700

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
134.28k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
178.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
78.16k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
38.26k (x5.64)
TOTAL
333.31k
429.25k (x1.29)

Performance/W
1700
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4