| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 5500U


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.3 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
860f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
261.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
15.63k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
23k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
8.62k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
6.51k (x0.45)
TOTAL
52.69k
53.76k (x1.02)

Multithread

1700

5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
90.38k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
118.74k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
48.39k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
4.4k (x0.65)
TOTAL
333.31k
261.91k (x0.79)

Performance/W
1700
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
17461 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4