Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 5500
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
373.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
15.32k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
22.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.3k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
21.19k (x1.28)
TOTAL
57.75k
68.8k (x1.19)
Multithread
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
80.25k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
163.59k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
72.83k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
7.34k (x1.15)
TOTAL
381.16k
324.01k (x0.85)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
22.09k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
24.59k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
10.94k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
22.89k (x1.58)
TOTAL
52.69k
80.52k (x1.53)
Multithread
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
124.44k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
167.06k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
74.34k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
7.2k (x1.06)
TOTAL
333.31k
373.05k (x1.12)
Performance/W
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
5739 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4