Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
140.97k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
11.1k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
18.97k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
3.9k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
3.39k (x0.2)
TOTAL
57.75k
37.37k (x0.65)
Multithread
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
45.74k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
75.47k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
21.89k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.49k (x0.55)
TOTAL
381.16k
146.6k (x0.38)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
10.88k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
18.09k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.29k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
3.36k (x0.23)
TOTAL
52.69k
36.64k (x0.7)
Multithread
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
42.44k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
73.82k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
20.76k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.96k (x0.58)
TOTAL
333.31k
140.97k (x0.42)
Performance/W
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4