Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
b06f5
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
47.14k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
25.77k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
13.25k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
14.77k (x1.02)
TOTAL
52.69k
100.94k (x1.92)
Multithread
1700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
168.51k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
142.8k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
63.57k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
15.34k (x2.26)
TOTAL
333.31k
390.23k (x1.17)
Performance/W
1700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4