| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906a4
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
297.46k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
23.03k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
24.11k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
13.9k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
12.11k (x0.73)
TOTAL
57.75k
73.15k (x1.27)

Multithread

1700

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
111.78k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
124.18k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
59.87k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
5.76k (x0.9)
TOTAL
381.16k
301.58k (x0.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
36.73k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.09k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
11.24k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
11.58k (x0.8)
TOTAL
52.69k
81.64k (x1.55)

Multithread

1700

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
130.18k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
110.21k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
50.76k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.31k (x0.93)
TOTAL
333.31k
297.46k (x0.89)

Performance/W
1700
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4