| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-1215U


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906a4
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
185.6k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
15.63k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
20.2k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.94k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
8.06k (x0.49)
TOTAL
57.75k
53.83k (x0.93)

Multithread

1700

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
35.72k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
56.41k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
25k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
12.48k (x1.95)
TOTAL
381.16k
129.6k (x0.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
37.56k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
21.13k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
11.35k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
10.31k (x0.71)
TOTAL
52.69k
80.34k (x1.52)

Multithread

1700

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
73.97k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
72.37k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
29.61k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
9.65k (x1.42)
TOTAL
333.31k
185.6k (x0.56)

Performance/W
1700
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4