| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i3-12100T


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
90675
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
330.62k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
22.25k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.02k
23.16k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
13.09k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.61k
13.21k (x0.8)
TOTAL
57.75k
71.7k (x1.24)

Multithread

1700

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
120.59k
77.43k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
197.34k
109.08k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.83k
52.45k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
8.75k (x1.37)
TOTAL
381.16k
247.71k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
43.24k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
23.76k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
12.67k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
13.88k (x0.96)
TOTAL
52.69k
93.54k (x1.78)

Multithread

1700

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
150.28k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
126.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
45.32k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
8.73k (x1.29)
TOTAL
333.31k
330.62k (x0.99)

Performance/W
1700
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4