| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c2
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
30.89k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
25.57k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
10.64k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
15.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
52.69k
82.77k (x1.57)

Multithread

1700

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
96.34k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
95.75k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
32.29k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
15.2k (x2.24)
TOTAL
333.31k
239.58k (x0.72)

Performance/W
1700
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4