| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i7-7700K


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700K is 1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906e9
Core
Barcelo
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
76.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
289.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
30.44k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
26.91k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
6.25k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
13.3k (x0.65)
TOTAL
70.65k
76.9k (x1.09)

Multithread

5625U

i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
127.73k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
123.68k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
29.34k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
9.08k (x1.77)
TOTAL
281.26k
289.82k (x1.03)

Performance/W
5625U
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
1302 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
3051 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
6765 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
2955 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
17089 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4