| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.3 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f11
Core
Cezanne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
333.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
12.65k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
20.95k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.63k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
14.47k (x0.97)
TOTAL
53.37k
52.69k (x0.99)

Multithread

5600H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
101.78k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
177.57k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
47.18k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
6.78k (x1.77)
TOTAL
255.19k
333.31k (x1.31)

Performance/W
5600H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4