| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i5-9500T


Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ea
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
274.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
24.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
21.41k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
4.82k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
10.73k (x0.43)
TOTAL
83.79k
61.46k (x0.73)

Multithread

5600

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
134.63k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
113.61k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
21.71k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
4.07k (x0.11)
TOTAL
429.25k
274.02k (x0.64)

Performance/W
5600
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4