| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs 1600X


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 257.2 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.5 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
800f11
Core
Lucienne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.23k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.24k points
173.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
14.63k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.53k
24.09k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.37k
5.51k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.46k
15.86k (x2.46)
TOTAL
52.23k
60.09k (x1.15)

Multithread

5500U

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
87.91k
48.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
116.93k
80.1k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.64k
24.5k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
19.85k (x4.16)
TOTAL
257.24k
173.2k (x0.67)

Performance/W
5500U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5861 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7795 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3176 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
318 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
17149 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3717 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5633 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2092 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1615 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13057 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4