Ryzen 5 5500 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f11
Core
Cezanne
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
13.95k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
22.02k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
5.17k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
16.61k (x0.78)
TOTAL
68.8k
57.75k (x0.84)
Multithread
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
120.59k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
197.34k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
56.83k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
6.41k (x0.87)
TOTAL
324.01k
381.16k (x1.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
12.65k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
20.95k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
4.63k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
14.47k (x0.63)
TOTAL
80.52k
52.69k (x0.65)
Multithread
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
101.78k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
177.57k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
47.18k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
6.78k (x0.94)
TOTAL
373.05k
333.31k (x0.89)
Performance/W
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4