Ryzen 5 3600X vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
306f2
Core
Matisse
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
18.62k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
10.49k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
4.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
3.26k (x0.15)
TOTAL
69.9k
36.41k (x0.52)
Multithread
3600X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
236.25k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
151.05k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
58.9k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
6.7k (x0.2)
TOTAL
376.22k
452.9k (x1.2)
Performance/W
3600X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4