| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600X vs Ryzen 7 5700U


Description
Both models 3600X and 5700U are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the 5700U gets 324.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.2 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
860f81
Core
Matisse
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
61.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
324.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
16.9k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
26.99k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
9.14k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
8.38k (x0.38)
TOTAL
69.9k
61.41k (x0.88)

Multithread

3600X

5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
115.46k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
144.12k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
60.27k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
5.07k (x0.15)
TOTAL
376.22k
324.93k (x0.86)

Performance/W
3600X
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
7697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
9608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
4018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
21662 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600X
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
3929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
6278 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
1948 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
14280 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4