Ryzen 5 3600X vs Core i9-13900KS
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 4.5 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 4.5 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
95 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
1708.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
57.69k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
33.34k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
17.55k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
18.76k (x0.86)
TOTAL
69.9k
127.35k (x1.82)
Multithread
3600X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
757.76k (x6.21)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
626.83k (x4.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
294.93k (x4.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
29.05k (x0.87)
TOTAL
376.22k
1708.56k (x4.54)
Performance/W
3600X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
11390 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4