Ryzen 5 3600X vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.4 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.4 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806d1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
24.09k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
19.54k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
8.48k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
11.68k (x0.53)
TOTAL
69.9k
63.79k (x0.91)
Multithread
3600X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
220.79k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
225.98k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
79.1k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
11.32k (x0.34)
TOTAL
376.22k
537.18k (x1.43)
Performance/W
3600X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4