Ryzen 5 3600X vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
31.66k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
26.21k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
11.96k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
18.5k (x0.84)
TOTAL
69.9k
88.34k (x1.26)
Multithread
3600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
210.36k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
203.84k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
72.05k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
9.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
376.22k
495.65k (x1.32)
Performance/W
3600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4