Ryzen 5 2600 vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
506e8
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
23.91k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
21.03k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.05k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
6.4k (x0.42)
TOTAL
57.13k
56.39k (x0.99)
Multithread
2600
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
95.3k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
91.94k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
22.06k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
2.3k (x0.34)
TOTAL
291.53k
211.6k (x0.73)
Performance/W
2600
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W