| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.6 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
50654
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
12.29k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
3.64k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
6.55k (x0.38)
TOTAL
45.06k
25.46k (x0.57)

Multithread

1600X

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
20.42k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
95.83k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
30.88k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
9.7k (x0.79)
TOTAL
124.3k
156.83k (x1.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
18.78k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
16.25k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
3.99k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
6.8k (x0.43)
TOTAL
60.09k
45.82k (x0.76)

Multithread

1600X

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
133.55k (x2.74)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
108.43k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
30.02k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
9.48k (x0.48)
TOTAL
173.2k
281.48k (x1.63)

Performance/W
1600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4