Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i9-14900K
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 10.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 10.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
1756.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
63.55k (x4.34)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
32.3k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
18.92k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
22.61k (x1.43)
TOTAL
60.09k
137.37k (x2.29)
Multithread
1600X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
813.87k (x16.69)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
608.32k (x7.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
313.09k (x12.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
21.31k (x1.07)
TOTAL
173.2k
1756.59k (x10.14)
Performance/W
1600X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
14053 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4