| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-8550U


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i7-8550U gets 166.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
64.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
166.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3.91k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
15.98k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.11k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
11.05k (x0.64)
TOTAL
45.06k
36.05k (x0.8)

Multithread

1600X

i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
11.76k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
50.15k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
16.76k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
4.17k (x0.34)
TOTAL
124.3k
82.84k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
25.37k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
22.6k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.13k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
11.1k (x0.7)
TOTAL
60.09k
64.2k (x1.07)

Multithread

1600X

i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
72.82k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
71.71k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
17.35k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
4.24k (x0.21)
TOTAL
173.2k
166.12k (x0.96)

Performance/W
1600X
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
4855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
11075 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5650 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2774 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16049 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4