Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-5820K
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306f2
Core
Summit Ridge
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
129.06k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3.82k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
9.64k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.29k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
3.78k (x0.22)
TOTAL
45.06k
21.53k (x0.48)
Multithread
1600X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
18.07k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
64.25k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
27.03k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
8.03k (x0.66)
TOTAL
124.3k
117.38k (x0.94)
Performance/W
1600X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
813 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
1308 points/W
838 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4338 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
11265 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4