| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0653
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
3.87k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
15.79k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.1k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
12.13k (x0.7)
TOTAL
45.06k
36.89k (x0.82)

Multithread

1600X

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
22.17k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
101.79k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
34.13k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
3.74k (x0.31)
TOTAL
124.3k
161.83k (x1.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
25.16k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
22.28k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
11.97k (x0.75)
TOTAL
60.09k
64.6k (x1.07)

Multithread

1600X

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
144.86k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
120.98k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
32.55k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
3.73k (x0.19)
TOTAL
173.2k
302.13k (x1.74)

Performance/W
1600X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4