Ryzen 5 1600X vs Atom N270
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the N270 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the N270 gets 3.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 36.6 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 124.3 k points while the N270 gets 3.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 36.6 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
106c2
Core
Summit Ridge
Diamondville
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
6/12
1 /2
TDP
95 W
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2017
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
4.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
0.37k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
0.74k (x0.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
0.73k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
0.44k (x0.03)
TOTAL
45.06k
2.28k (x0.05)
Multithread
1600X
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
0.55k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
1.26k (x0.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
1.09k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
0.47k (x0.04)
TOTAL
124.3k
3.37k (x0.03)
Performance/W
1600X
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
205 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
813 points/W
421 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
129 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
1308 points/W
1125 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
988 points/GHz
229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
463 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
457 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4338 points/GHz
277 points/GHz
TOTAL
11265 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4