| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 4.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806d0
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.4k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
20.25k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
11.69k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
11.66k (x0.67)
TOTAL
45.06k
48.01k (x1.07)

Multithread

1600X

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
38.93k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
191.89k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
108.8k (x7.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
14.95k (x1.22)
TOTAL
124.3k
354.57k (x2.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
30.84k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
26.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
12.66k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
11.74k (x0.74)
TOTAL
60.09k
81.62k (x1.36)

Multithread

1600X

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
294.86k (x6.05)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
280.92k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
113.9k (x4.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
20.16k (x1.02)
TOTAL
173.2k
709.85k (x4.1)

Performance/W
1600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4