Ryzen 5 1600X vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 4.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 4.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a70f41
Core
Summit Ridge
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
38.25k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
29.92k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
15.5k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
29.89k (x1.88)
TOTAL
60.09k
113.57k (x1.89)
Multithread
1600X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
309.6k (x6.35)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
260.4k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
128.56k (x5.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
20.04k (x1.01)
TOTAL
173.2k
718.59k (x4.15)
Performance/W
1600X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4