| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 10.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
9.77k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
24.52k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
17.17k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
21.37k (x1.23)
TOTAL
45.06k
72.83k (x1.62)

Multithread

1600X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
145.21k (x7.46)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
444.95k (x5.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
318.3k (x20.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
27.2k (x2.22)
TOTAL
124.3k
935.66k (x7.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
58.6k (x4)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
33.29k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
17.77k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
19.49k (x1.23)
TOTAL
60.09k
129.15k (x2.15)

Multithread

1600X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
804.04k (x16.49)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
613.45k (x7.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
311.08k (x12.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
34.5k (x1.74)
TOTAL
173.2k
1763.08k (x10.18)

Performance/W
1600X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4