Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-13600K
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 5.9 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 5.9 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
1023.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
54.36k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
29.93k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
15.39k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
15.52k (x0.98)
TOTAL
60.09k
115.19k (x1.92)
Multithread
1600X
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
457.21k (x9.38)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
360.82k (x4.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
172.64k (x7.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
32.91k (x1.66)
TOTAL
173.2k
1023.59k (x5.91)
Performance/W
1600X
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
8189 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4