Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
90672
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
37.79k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
24.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
12.44k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
13.71k (x0.86)
TOTAL
60.09k
88.01k (x1.46)
Multithread
1600X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
212.6k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
197.81k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
84.35k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
17.48k (x0.88)
TOTAL
173.2k
512.23k (x2.96)
Performance/W
1600X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4