| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
806c2
Core
Summit Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1600X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.95k
4.57k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
17.21k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.97k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.35k
14.98k (x0.86)
TOTAL
45.06k
46.75k (x1.04)

Multithread

1600X

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
19.47k
12.75k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
77.19k
45.98k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.4k
27.86k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
20.06k (x1.64)
TOTAL
124.3k
106.66k (x0.86)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
30.89k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
25.57k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
10.64k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
15.66k (x0.99)
TOTAL
60.09k
82.77k (x1.38)

Multithread

1600X

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
96.34k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
95.75k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
32.29k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
15.2k (x0.77)
TOTAL
173.2k
239.58k (x1.38)

Performance/W
1600X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4