| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-9700K


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.7 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
906ec
Core
Summit Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
460.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
29.3k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
25.61k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.86k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
12.86k (x0.84)
TOTAL
56.16k
73.62k (x1.31)

Multithread

1600

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
217.77k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
190.46k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
40.48k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
11.31k (x1.67)
TOTAL
272.8k
460.02k (x1.69)

Performance/W
1600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
4842 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4