| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
800f11
Core
Lucienne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
173.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
14.63k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
24.09k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
5.51k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
15.86k (x3.05)
TOTAL
52.35k
60.09k (x1.15)

Multithread

5300U

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
48.75k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
80.1k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
24.5k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
19.85k (x4.31)
TOTAL
198.38k
173.2k (x0.87)

Performance/W
5300U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4