| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i7-4770K


Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4770K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i7-4770K gets 173.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4770K is 1.2 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
43.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
173.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
21.28k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
12.25k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.78k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.9k (x1.23)
TOTAL
43.7k
43.21k (x0.99)

Multithread

3350U

i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
86.17k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
56.81k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
21.88k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
9.07k (x2.75)
TOTAL
144.84k
173.93k (x1.2)

Performance/W
3350U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1026 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
676 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
260 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
2071 points/W

Performance/GHz
3350U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1226 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
11079 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4