Ryzen 3 3300U vs Core i7-4770
Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4770 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4770 is 1.3 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4770 is 1.3 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
45.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
184k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
23.02k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
11.89k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
5.29k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
4.98k (x1.03)
TOTAL
40.81k
45.19k (x1.11)
Multithread
3300U
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
94.23k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
59.02k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
25.06k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.69k (x1.16)
TOTAL
139.56k
184k (x1.32)
Performance/W
3300U
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
703 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
2191 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5902 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
11586 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4