Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-4790
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
173.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.51k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
11.24k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.03k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
5.02k (x0.76)
TOTAL
33.79k
25.8k (x0.76)
Multithread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
15.72k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
54.99k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
23.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.48k (x0.84)
TOTAL
108.01k
100.06k (x0.93)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.52k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
11.94k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
4.96k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
4.84k (x0.73)
TOTAL
48k
35.25k (x0.73)
Multithread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
54.7k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
52.41k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
24.5k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.77k (x1.03)
TOTAL
165.91k
138.37k (x0.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
14.07k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
12.63k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.35k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
4.98k (x0.68)
TOTAL
48.63k
37.03k (x0.76)
Multithread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
57.88k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
60.83k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
24.4k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.95k (x1.06)
TOTAL
166.79k
150.07k (x0.9)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.19k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
12.45k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.11k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
4.98k (x0.91)
TOTAL
49.21k
44.73k (x0.91)
Multithread
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
87.14k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
58k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
22.75k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6k (x1.1)
TOTAL
168.69k
173.89k (x1.03)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
2070 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4