Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-4790
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 2.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
173.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
4.51k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
11.24k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
5.03k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
5.02k (x1.71)
TOTAL
17.02k
25.8k (x1.52)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
15.72k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
54.99k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
23.87k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
5.48k (x1.94)
TOTAL
42.02k
100.06k (x2.38)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
13.52k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
11.94k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.96k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
4.84k (x1.65)
TOTAL
33.14k
35.25k (x1.06)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
54.7k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
52.41k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
24.5k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
6.77k (x2.23)
TOTAL
64.82k
138.37k (x2.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
14.07k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
12.63k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.35k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
4.98k (x1.53)
TOTAL
39.03k
37.03k (x0.95)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
57.88k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
60.83k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
24.4k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
6.95k (x2.26)
TOTAL
68.8k
150.07k (x2.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.19k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
12.45k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.11k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4.98k (x1.28)
TOTAL
36.77k
44.73k (x1.22)
Multithread
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
87.14k (x4.33)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
58k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
22.75k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6k (x1.81)
TOTAL
71.02k
173.89k (x2.45)
Performance/W
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2070 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4