FX 6300 vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
40651
Core
Vishera
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
46.09k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
6.4k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
6.2k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.5k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
2.05k (x0.39)
TOTAL
23.14k
17.15k (x0.74)
Multithread
6300
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
12.86k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
15.12k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
5.76k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
2.15k (x0.55)
TOTAL
66.43k
35.88k (x0.54)
Performance/W
6300
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
1008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
143 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
2392 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
3263 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
9024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4