FX 4100 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 8.6 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 8.6 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
800f11
Core
Zambezi
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2011
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
13.95k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
22.02k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
5.17k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
16.61k (x3.5)
TOTAL
22.18k
57.75k (x2.6)
Multithread
4100
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
120.59k (x7.76)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
197.34k (x13.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
56.83k (x7.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
6.41k (x1.13)
TOTAL
44.31k
381.16k (x8.6)
Performance/W
4100
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
5864 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4