Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
12.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
20.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.63k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
14.47k (x2.66)
TOTAL
43.82k
52.69k (x1.2)
Multithread
3000G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
101.78k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
177.57k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
47.18k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
6.78k (x1.21)
TOTAL
95.84k
333.31k (x3.48)
Performance/W
3000G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4