A12 9800 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.3 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.3 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
800f11
Core
Bristol Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
12.65k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
20.95k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
4.63k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
14.47k (x4.73)
TOTAL
37.86k
52.69k (x1.39)
Multithread
9800
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
101.78k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
177.57k (x4.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
47.18k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
6.78k (x1.55)
TOTAL
100.79k
333.31k (x3.31)
Performance/W
9800
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4